top of page

Updated: Aug 2


Max and Florence

Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way. Tolstoy; Anna Karenina


Family: Oxford English Dictionary: A group consisting of two parents and their children living together as a unit.


Not a useful concept for us psychological orphans. While later definitions broaden to include variations on the primal unit, like single parent families, there’s lots left out. And as gender identity becomes more nuanced, leading to as yet unrealized possibilities for human closeness, the conventional notion of family exhibits its meagreness even more.


In addition, for some of us the word ‘family’ is loaded with near overwhelming associations, many of them crazy-making.


My crooked life’s journey in pursuit of elusive wholeness began with the ongoing attempt to escape my family of origin, those who brought me into the world with, I assume, the best of intentions.h Actually, they didn’t have intentions. In those days, and until relatively recently, when you married, you produced children. Period. You didn’t think about what it meant to have children, how you would rear them, pay for them, guide them--let alone psychologically what they would do to you and you to them.


So in the early nineteen forties in Orange, New Jersey, my thirty-two year old mother Florence and twenty-seven year old father Max did what was expected: they produced two children. They were not young when they had us, certainly by the standards of that time. And it was not easy, constrained as they were by the demands of their parents, upon whom they relied for material support. Emotional support was in short to no supply.


Their marriage was arranged by my grandparents who met at a Jewish resort in the Poconos, each lamenting the unmarried status of one of their offspring. Pressure was brought to bear on two people whose emotional fragility might have made it far more sensible for each to forswear if not matrimony, at least child bearing. My father, I was unintentionally informed by an aunt, had been married once before. I speculate the childless union ended when his partner discovered his depression, often debilitating.


My mother, the middle child, was sandwiched between older brother Carl and ten years younger sister, Truda. Carl was awarded pride of place, a position often accompanying the status of being eldest child, comma, male. Truda was the bright-eyed baby, indulged and adored. Mother Florence picked up the pieces of a family business needing an extra pair of hands. In my grandparents’ small New Jersey inn, she helped the housekeeper polish silver, set tables, prepare rooms for guests. All this done under the commanding presence of her mother, Anna, whose steely resolve and domineering temperament made it unwise for anyone to cross her.


My mother never did challenge her, living much of her life under the weight of this unyielding matriarch, born in Russia and part of the early twentieth century’s Jewish emigration to America. Anna’s husband, my beloved grandfather David, was a benign figure, spending his days reading the Talmud. I still remember him with love and my grandmother with fear. But looking at all of this from my strong womanist position over seventy years later, I wonder how he managed to let her do most of the work while he studied and kept aloof from the business of the inn.


My father finished grade eight, and made his living as a labourer. My mother, a secondary school graduate, was a bookkeeper. When I was six, the inn was sold and we moved to south Florida.There we all lived in a house with my maternal grandparents, where Anna’s controlling presence made itself felt daily. My mother kept books for small businesses, writing numbers neatly on ruled sheets. My father unloaded trucks, chopped vegetables in the overheated kitchens of small restaurants, delivered furniture. They all lived and died in that house. I left for university and didn’t look back.


A writer’s memory is both a blessing and a curse. However inaccurate, memories of my early struggles feel like yesterday. Now there’s an urgency to put things in place, the wind no longer at my ageing back but in front of me.


Almost everything has changed since childhood and early adulthood-and way beyond that now. I’ve found enduring new families--more than one, for I have collected new families of one sort or another ever since I fled my early one. They helped make me whole. But my origins remain vivid. I look back over a wide chasm at mother father grandparents. Their imprint remains strong. I no longer wish to run away from them; harder, though, is loving them. Now I understand their agonies, I seek a more compassionate heart with which to honour my long-dead forebears.


I’ve come to believe nature plays a dominant role to nurture. The conviction comes from my struggle to be a different person leading a fuller life than my ancestors. I’ve worked hard breaking out of restricted places; progress has ensued. But I cannot escape the genetic lottery. I see a line of domineering women stretching back in time. There’s my great-grandmother, my grandmother, my mother’s youngest sister and myself. My mother, alas, couldn’t compete in the strong female category. Her frustration came out in anger, continuous jabbing at her husband and eldest daughter--me.


Unlike mother, I occupy a place in the strong female category, a perch often challenging-- to myself and others. I’ve forsworn trying to be the appealing ‘girl next door’ or the friendly grandmother who hands out cookies and smiles kindly upon noisy, messy children. I’m desperate to be liked and put out endless energy to engage others (using intellect and charm, not beauty). But if I have to choose between being liked and being opinionated, between being served or being heard, between being pretty or being strong--I choose the second option every time.


To the memory of my parents, I give a wistful salute, a begrudging thanks, a lingering, never-to-be-completed good-bye.


Rose Levinson, April 2019

…………………………...

 

177 views2 comments

Updated: Aug 2



This is the way the world ends

Not with a bang but a whimper. -- T.S. Eliot The Hollow Men 1925


Choking on Brexit, Trump, climate catastrophe; reappearance of nuclear weapons; right-wing populism; lost refugees. Grasping for a way to live with profound disorder. No matter what happens in the next decades, things will not go back to where they are in 2019, let alone where they were earlier. Too much breakage, a dismantling of a world order that held fairly steady since the end of World War II. The Enlightenment is finished. We can no longer be buoyed by belief in a steady march toward progress.

I try to envision the world fifty years from now, and can't do it. Part of this is lack of imagination; another is the limitations I experience as someone not easy with computers. I'm in awe of these relatively new technologies, how they communalize the world, their nearly unimaginable uses in medicine, space travel, artificial intelligence, art. As with the ancient discovery of fire, computers are irreversibly re-making the world. Awesome is the apt word. And this rapidly shifting world is also overwhelming, exhausting, confusing.


Topping the list of what keeps me up at night is Brexit and its toxic uncertainties. Powerlessly, I await the next steps in this self inflicted mess, dread mingled with fury.


Many have said this is the biggest crisis facing the UK since World War Two. Now, as then, the integrity of the UK is at stake and questions as to how--and if--it will function as a solitary island in a huge sea are unanswerable in full but horribly distressing in part.

The Tory Prime Minister, Teresa May, and the leader of the Labour Party opposition, Jeremy Corbyn, are both enablers of a disastrous process which began with the stupidity of David Cameron. They are not villains; neither of them wishes to do evil. Ironically, though,they are shadow images of one another. Both are rigid and unimaginative individuals whose skills are all wrong for coping in today's multi-faceted world. May and Corbyn blunder their way through a difficult situation relying on old truths they each internalized over many years.


May believes it is her duty to deliver Brexit, no matter the costs. She is, if nothing else, dutiful, a beaurocrat to the core. Corbyn, on the other hand, though a lifelong rebel against the establishment, is trapped in his own unalterable belief systems. Not adjusting core principles in sixty-nine years is less a strength than a symptom of stubborn inflexibility. May has sold out to her right wing, those who jeer her into ever more treacherous decisions. Corbyn remains true to himself. The other side of this self-regard is an inability to comprehend there are other truths worthy of attention. He argues from rigidity, May answers in the same coin, the world watches as the drama unfolds.


Where to seek comfort at least, meaning at best? My temperament drives me to forego futility as an option. Fueled by an ongoing sense of outrage (a challenging yet energizing temperament), I engage. Bravehearted Extinction Rebellion has a great slogan: 'Hope dies. Action begins.' I don't have any hope. Things will not get appreciably better in my lifetime. I'm old now, and my personal narrative will end before the next period of stability arrives--if it ever does.


Books are where I go for solace, scribbling random bits of poetry and prose. I believe language can save me, though my rational self knows words are simulacra. That's not how it feels when a sentence miraculously makes sense of the incomprehensible.


E.M. Forester is among those who bring me succor. His 1951 collection of essays Two Cheers for Democracy ( democracy doesn't yet rate three he wryly notes) was written during the run-up to WWII and just after it ended. In that time of crisis and foreboding, 1939, Forester wrote:


“Those of us who were brought up in the old order...know that order has vanished from the earth. We hope of course that a new tune, inaudible to ourselves, is now being played to the young...But on that point we get no evidence, and never shall get any. We do expect though that those who chronicle this age and its silliness, and look back from their intellectual day upon us, the tongue holders, will accord us not only pity, which we fully deserve, but disdain. “


In that same year, he observed: “...all the decent human relations occur during the intervals when force has not managed to come to the fore. These intervals are what matter….I call them ‘civilisation.’”


In between intervals, there’s light in Forester. Read him. It may help.


Rose Levinson, February 2019

115 views4 comments

Updated: Aug 2


Andrew Wyeth: Christina's World

Outsider, definition: one not involved with a particular group of people or organization, one who does not live in a particular place; in addition, a person not liked or accepted as a member of any of these entities who feels different from those who are accepted as members.


I’m one of those outsider types by virtue of both birth and temperament. Born into a working class family where money was scarce,  in school I located myself at the margins. My clothing wasn’t right, my hair looked funny, my mother forbade me to shave my legs. I kept aloof,  a sense of not having what it takes pushing me to the edge. The girls who made decisions about who’s in and who’s out were like Penny, she of the pin-curled sandy hair and patterned polyester blouse that matched her ironed skirt. Or Liz , who smiled for no reason and laughed for even less. Boys came to her unbidden, and Johnny Palmeri cracked my heart as he danced off with her to the cafeteria. Oh the pain of not being pretty.


As if not being pretty weren’t enough,  I was smart, really smart. I understood concepts quickly, grasped abstract notions easily, wrote well. Maths were a weak spot, but in other areas of learning, I excelled. What a trial to be smart, another separation from any sense of belonging. Back in the day, being smart was not something a girl  would be proud of, let alone display. It would get in the way of her femininity, her desirability, any chance of making a happy family life (the alternative of a satisfactory life alone was near unthinkable unless you were immune to the disdain in the word ‘spinster.’)


Writing this now, I could be describing a Martian landscape where the inhabitants look like petrol pumps and have as many thoughts. Nineteen fifties social expectations limited the idea of what it means to be a woman, let alone vaguely consider that one may choose to identify as non-binary and hence neither female nor male. So it was that smart, unpretty me struggled to feel part of something beyond an unhappy childhood home and a working class neighborhood devoid of intellectual stimulation. My grandfather was the only one with a sense of what might be lurking inside my ten year old awkward self. ‘Colour outside the lines’, he told me, ‘don’t copy what others do.’


Much of my life energy is in the service of engaging my intellect but still colouring outside the lines. The view from the margins offers insights  obscured and dismissed by occupants of the solid middle. The danger is veering too far off course, to either left or right. The outsider can lose her way. Depression for women; violence for men. Panic attacks for me. For along with intellect, my outsiderness is fed by intense sensitivity to what I perceive as reality.


The positive side is an ability to read others quickly and understand intuitively; to grasp nuances of literature and social thought; to hold onto contradictory ideas and not insist they are reconcilable. The downside is an over-reaction: to people, to ideas, to any kind of stimuli. The sensitivity that opens so many doors is the same trait which shuts me off from other people, other ideas. In defending my intellect, the sensitive me risks curtailing openness and encouraging my own self-righteousness.


Conversation: Snow White’s wicked stepmother peering into her looking glass: Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s the prettiest one of all?

Rose looking into her reflection: Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s the smartest one of all?


Woe betide anyone with the wrong answer, even if the responder is my dearly beloved life-partner who continually challenges my insistence that I’m right. We embody contradictions in our pairing of Scottish engineer with Jewish intellectual. Often I’m distressed when he doesn’t understand what my smart, sensitive self discerns to be an absolute truth. He’s upset because I don’t hew to his rational, more accepting world view. His far more benign world view can balance my impassioned views --when it’s not another occasion for my outrage at his lack of understanding.


The internal battle of being an Outsider who still wishes to connect and to have an impact continues. The reward for the struggle comes in those moments of clarity when I’m pretty sure I’ve got it right-- mostly through words.


Rose Levinson

165 views2 comments
bottom of page